About ACISC

About ACISC

Independent international accreditation and quality assurance
for educational institutions.

Who We Are

About ACISC

Independent international accreditation and quality assurance
for educational institutions.

Who We Serve

Supporting Educational Institutions

01

FOR SCHOOLS

ACISC supports schools in developing strong academic and
institutional practices that meet established standards of
educational quality. Through assessment, guidance, and
accreditation, schools can identify their strengths, address
areas for improvement, enhance student services, and develop
sustainable systems for continuous institutional improvement.

02

FOR COLLEGES & UNIVERSITIES

ACISC works with colleges and universities to strengthen
academic quality, institutional effectiveness, governance,
and student support services. Our accreditation framework
provides institutions with a structured opportunity to
evaluate their programs, policies, resources, and educational
outcomes while establishing practical strategies for
long-term improvement.

Our Purpose

Our Purpose

Quality is not a one-time achievement. It is an ongoing
process of evaluation, responsibility, and improvement.

Institutions

Who We Serve

ACISC works with educational institutions seeking an independent
framework for institutional evaluation, quality assurance, and
continuous improvement.

Eligible Educational Organizations

Depending on applicable eligibility requirements and
accreditation pathways, this may include:

  • Schools and international schools
  • Colleges
  • Universities
  • Higher education institutions
  • Other eligible educational organizations

Context Matters

Educational institutions operate within different legal,
cultural, educational, and regulatory environments. ACISC
therefore recognizes the importance of evaluating institutional
quality within the appropriate context while maintaining clear
accreditation standards and expectations.

Institutions remain responsible for meeting the legal and
regulatory requirements applicable to their operations,
regardless of their accreditation status.

Our Principles

OUR CORE VALUES

Our work is guided by a set of core values that shape how we
evaluate, support, and collaborate with educational institutions.

01

Quality

We promote high standards in academic and institutional
performance.

02

Integrity

We encourage ethical, transparent, and responsible practices.

03

Objectivity

We seek to conduct evaluations using clear and consistent
criteria.

04

Continuous Improvement

We encourage institutions to identify opportunities for
development and pursue sustainable improvement.

05

Respect and Inclusion

We value the dignity, equality, diversity, and contribution
of individuals and communities.


Quality Assurance

Our Approach to Quality Assurance

Effective quality assurance requires more than policies on
paper. It requires evidence that institutional policies,
systems, and practices are implemented, monitored, evaluated,
and improved.

ACISC’s accreditation approach is therefore built around
several interconnected elements:

01

Defined Standards

Institutions are evaluated against established standards that
provide a common framework for considering important aspects
of institutional quality and effectiveness.

02

Institutional Evidence

Institutions are expected to provide appropriate evidence
demonstrating how their policies, practices, resources, and
systems operate and contribute to the fulfillment of their
mission.

03

Evaluation

Evaluation provides an opportunity to examine institutional
information, evidence, and practices in a structured manner
and to identify areas of strength and areas requiring further
attention.

04

Review and Decision-Making

Accreditation involves formal review and decision-making in
accordance with the applicable standards, policies, and
procedures.

The Organization

Who Is ACISC?


Accreditation Framework

What ACISC Does

ACISC establishes and administers an accreditation framework
for eligible educational institutions. The framework provides
a structured basis for institutional evaluation and quality
assurance.

Depending on the applicable accreditation pathway, ACISC’s
work may include:

  • Defining and maintaining accreditation standards.
  • Establishing requirements and procedures for institutional evaluation.
  • Reviewing institutional information and supporting evidence.
  • Supporting institutional self-evaluation and preparation.
  • Conducting or coordinating appropriate evaluation activities.
  • Considering findings from evaluation and review.
  • Making or facilitating formal accreditation decisions in accordance with applicable procedures.
  • Supporting ongoing institutional improvement and periodic review.
  • Providing appropriate public information about accreditation status.

The specific requirements and procedures applicable to an
institution depend on the relevant accreditation framework,
institutional type, eligibility, and current ACISC policies.


Evidence & Evaluation

Our Approach to Quality Assurance

Effective quality assurance requires more than policies on
paper. It requires evidence that institutional policies,
systems, and practices are implemented, monitored, evaluated,
and improved.

01

Defined Standards

Institutions are evaluated against established standards that
provide a common framework for considering important aspects
of institutional quality and effectiveness.

02

Institutional Evidence

Institutions are expected to provide appropriate evidence
demonstrating how their policies, practices, resources, and
systems operate and contribute to the fulfillment of their
mission.

03

Evaluation

Evaluation provides an opportunity to examine institutional
information, evidence, and practices in a structured manner
and to identify areas of strength and areas requiring further
attention.

04

Review and Decision-Making

Accreditation involves formal review and decision-making in
accordance with the applicable standards, policies, and
procedures.


Independence

Independence Matters

Independence is fundamental to meaningful accreditation. An
accreditation organization must be able to evaluate
institutions and administer its accreditation processes
without becoming an extension of the institutions it
evaluates or of governmental authorities.

ACISC operates independently of governmental authorities and
the educational institutions participating in its accreditation
processes. Its accreditation activities are intended to be
guided by defined standards, documented procedures,
appropriate evidence, and evaluation processes.

Independence does not mean operating without accountability.
A credible accreditation organization should be transparent
about its standards, processes, responsibilities, governance,
and applicable policies.

ACISC therefore seeks to make information about its
accreditation framework and institutional status accessible
so that institutions and other stakeholders can understand
the basis and boundaries of accreditation.


Important Information

ACCREDITATION IS NOT GOVERNMENT AUTHORIZATION

ACISC accreditation is an independent quality-assurance
process. It does not replace or supersede governmental
authorization, licensing, regulatory approval, or other legal
requirements applicable to an educational institution.

Institutions remain responsible for complying with all
applicable laws, regulations, licensing requirements,
registration requirements, and governmental obligations in the
jurisdictions in which they operate.

Accreditation should therefore be understood as distinct from
governmental recognition, licensing, authorization, or
regulatory approval.

Recognition or acceptance of an accreditation credential may
also vary according to the requirements of a particular
government, regulator, university, employer, professional body,
or other organization. Stakeholders should independently verify
the requirements that apply to their specific circumstances.


Understanding Status

Membership Is Not Accreditation

ACISC maintains a clear distinction between membership and
accreditation.

Membership in an ACISC program or community does not, by
itself, mean that an institution has been accredited.

Similarly, submitting an accreditation application does not
mean that accreditation has been granted. An institution may
also be determined eligible to proceed with an accreditation
process without having received an accreditation decision.

These distinctions are important because accreditation
represents a formal status resulting from an applicable
evaluation and decision-making process.

Four Important Distinctions

  • Membership is not the same as accreditation.
  • Application is not accreditation.
  • Eligibility is not accreditation.
  • Accreditation is not government authorization.

Visitors should always verify an institution’s current
accreditation status through ACISC’s official institutional
information.


Important Information

What Accreditation Does Not Guarantee

  • Government recognition or approval
  • University admission
  • Credit transfer
  • Academic equivalency
  • Employment
  • Professional licensing
  • Immigration eligibility
  • Acceptance by a particular university, employer, regulator, or professional body

Students, parents, institutions, and other stakeholders should
verify the requirements of the specific organization or
authority whose decision is relevant to them.


The Process

Understanding the Accreditation Journey

Accreditation is a structured process rather than a single
application or designation.

1

Initial Information

An institution considers whether ACISC accreditation is
appropriate for its circumstances and educational context.

2

Eligibility

The institution’s readiness and applicable eligibility
considerations are reviewed before progressing through the
relevant accreditation pathway.

3

Application and Preparation

An eligible institution proceeds through the applicable
application and preparation requirements.

4

Self-Evaluation and Evidence

The institution examines its practices against the relevant
standards and prepares appropriate evidence.

5

Evaluation

Institutional information and evidence are reviewed through
the applicable evaluation process.

6

Accreditation Decision

Findings are considered through the applicable
decision-making process and an accreditation determination
is made.

7

Ongoing Review

Accreditation is connected to continued institutional
responsibility, monitoring, evaluation, and improvement.

The exact requirements, stages, documentation, evaluation
activities, and decision procedures applicable to an institution
are defined by the relevant ACISC policies and accreditation
framework.


Students & Parents

Information for Students and Parents

Accreditation information can be important when students and
families evaluate an educational institution. However, an
accreditation credential should always be considered in
context.

Before relying on an institution’s accreditation status,
students and parents should verify that:

  • The institution is currently listed as accredited.
  • The accreditation applies to the institution or educational activity being considered.
  • The accreditation status is current.
  • Any relevant scope or conditions are understood.
  • The university, government authority, employer, professional body, or other organization whose requirements matter accepts or recognizes the credential where applicable.

Accreditation alone should not be treated as a guarantee of
admission, transfer of academic credit, employment, professional
licensing, immigration eligibility, or recognition by every
external organization.


Accreditation Framework

Learn How ACISC Accreditation Works

Whether you represent an educational institution, are
considering an institution for yourself or your family, or are
seeking information about educational quality assurance, ACISC
provides information about its accreditation framework,
standards, and processes.

Explore the accreditation framework to understand the standards,
evidence, evaluation, and review involved in the accreditation
process.


Important Information About ACISC Accreditation

Important Information About ACISC Accreditation

ACISC accreditation is an independent quality-assurance
process. It does not replace governmental authorization,
licensing, regulatory approval, or other legal requirements
applicable to an educational institution.

Membership, application, and eligibility are distinct from
accreditation. An institution should be considered accredited
only where ACISC’s official information confirms a current
accreditation status.

Recognition or acceptance of accreditation may vary according
to the requirements of individual governments, regulators,
universities, employers, professional bodies, and other
organizations. Stakeholders should verify applicable
requirements independently.


Explore ACISC

Discover How ACISC Can Support Your Institution

Discover how ACISC can support your institution through
accreditation, quality evaluation, professional guidance, and
continuous improvement.

Whether you represent a school, college, university, or
educational organization, our framework provides a structured
pathway for evaluating institutional performance and
strengthening educational quality.